Hackers turned Ukrainian ministry of education website into porn page

Evidence of Coudenhove Kalergi plan

A post mortem examination of the United States Democratic Party

If it is to survive the Democratic Party must change. If it continues on the awful path it has consistently been on since 1992 then it will deservedly perish despite the best intentions of activists in organisations such as Justice Democrats and Democrats For Life of America. The Democratic Party has shamelessly betrayed, turned against and left behind it's main base which was the working class people of America. It may seem strange to the younger generations of America but the Democratic Party was once vibrant, full of ideas and solutions while it was the party of the New Deal. It used to be the party of labour unions and increasing income for working class people. The Democrats have lost their way and it is no accident. William Jefferson Bythe III (also known as Bill Clinton) and Albert Arnold Gore III re-branded the party as New Democrats in 1992 when the corporate puppets of the Democratic Leadership Council took over. The only reason this hair brained experiment succeeded in the beginning was that Ross Perot's Reform Party took a gargantuan bite out of the Republican Party due to George Herbert Walker Bush's disastrous negotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement which was a titanium bar to the knees of workers in America, Canada and Mexico. A North American Free Trade Agreement that the New Democrats subsequently implemented. Outsourcing and shipping out working class people's employment and way of life was bad enough but Clinton and Gore compounded this catastrophe with the cataclysm of repealing Glass Steagall and the Banking Act. If anyone thinks describing the aforementioned as catastrophic and cataclysmic is hyperbolic there are aspects that must be taken into consideration. The repeal of Glass Steagall and the Banking Act led to the Wall Street crash which caused an international financial and economic series of crises. This led to lower living standards across much of the world considering many of the working class people there were not wealthy to begin with. Another facet to comprehend is that NAFTA was an economic disaster for America, Canada and Mexico. Anyone asserting otherwise is living in a fantasy abstract and it is imperative that they face the brutal reality. Real incomes have regressed in all three nations. Trade union statements by workers in each countries confirm this as do numerous economic studies in all three countries. Clinton also granted the People's Republic of China permanent normal trading relations which decreased American exports and heavily damaged manufacturing in America. Abandonment of tariffs and economic trade barriers have been disastrous for working class people across the world and this is true in a North American context. Another dangerous development from NAFTA is that it has led to further attempted corporate takeovers and coups borne out of malevolence. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership TTIP and Trans Pacific Partnership TPP would have given corporations power over national executives, national judiciaries, national legislatures and international law. Fortunately Brexit killed TTIP and Trump killed TPP but the latter's action will be meaningless unless he stops the Trade and Investment Services Agreement TISA. This is the Fascist merger of corporate and state Benito Mussolini described. Not only would the right wing corporate Democrats have acquiesced to this but they would have been supportive and advocated for it. This is a major component of the massive plethora of problems the party has. This zealous belief in neoliberal free trade policies killed working people who formed the base of the Democratic Party and led to one of their former corporate donors Queen's plutocrat Donald John Trump being able to run a platform with populist trade and jobs protectionism as a victorious Republican candidate. Tariffs, trade barriers and job protectionism should have formed a considerable majority of Democratic Party economic platforms, economic programs and economic policies. They did not and hence why there is a far right dystopia and excrement tempest in the United States of America today. Only Illinois and New Jersey saw increases in Democratic Party representation under Obama, three representatives and one representative in said states, and his right wing donor friendly policies were to blame.

Another major obstacle is their zealous pro abortion position that they push. In case they had not noticed there are millions of Americans who don't want to vote for pro abortion representatives never mind pro abortion candidates who are right wing corporate Republicans on economic issues. A third of Democrats are pro life. Yet they are ignored or demonised by their own party. They sided with Sanders last time begrudgingly as he was pro life on every issue except abortion. This is disgraceful hostility who hold legitimate political beliefs. The corporate right wingers of the DNC and DLC thought it correct to impose those who held the same position as Nixon and Reagan such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on working class people who wanted to protect the lives and human rights of children. It must be emphasised again that pro life Democrats don't vote for pro abortion Republicans. Democrats complain about and lament the fact there are 37 states with child protection laws they describe as targeted regulation of abortion providers. They do not follow the logic of people voting representatives who legislate such statutes wanting to abolish the practise altogether never mind targeted regulation. Justice Democrats make the monumental mistake of backing the corporate Democrats on this. Both hypocritically mindlessly drone the mantra of a Nation of Islam, an African American racist supremacist organisation, inspired movement about African American lives mattering however both ignore the facts that over 1,800 American American children are killed by abortion daily and that over sixteen million African Americans have been killed in this manner since Roe versus Wade and Doe versus Bolton. Make no mistake by the letter of international law this should be a prosecutable indictment of genocide. As should the killing of over 22 million Caucasian children, over 11 million Hispanic and Latino children, almost 3 million Polynesian children and over 1.7 million Native children as all of these constitute partial destruction of these groups of people thus this is in clear violation of international laws. If the Democrats want to succeed they can no longer ignore a third of their party and international law. They have rarely cared about the latter. Does anyone seriously think war crimes in the American Civil War were limited to bloodthirsty Republicans fighting for the Union? Have people forgotten that a Democrat spouted bovine excrement about small nations being liberated while leading America into an unnecessary international imperial war of mass slaughter and genocide? It should be noted that Harry Truman suffered post traumatic stress syndrome from his service in said war. It should also be considered that Harry Truman was the Democrat who literally flattened two cities in Japan. Flattened with nuclear munitions which literally burned men, women and children from the inside out. Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the president who turned Louisiana's Huey Long's Share the Wealth policy into the New Deal, had originally provoked Imperial Japan into attacking the United States of America at Pearl Harbour in Hawaii. It was Democratic president John Fitzgerald Kennedy who implemented the hugely disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion against Cuba which had been planned by Dwight David Eisenhower's Republican administration. Democrats Kennedy and Lyndon Baines Johnson, of Great Society and civil rights fame, continued Eisenhower's war against the south east Asian nation of Vietnam, a war which Vietnam eventually won. People forget that a Democrat Jimmy Carter originally intervened in the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan, which was then governed by the socialist People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan, in Operation Cyclone which ultimately led to the creation of the far right Wahhabi terror group al Qaeda. Bill Clinton helped Britain sustain military occupation and partition of Ireland and helped Medinat Yisrael sustain it's military occupation and partition of Palestine. Clinton also carried out heavy carpet bombing in Iraq and Yugoslavia. Clinton's administration bragged about interfering in the 1996 Russian election on behalf of Boris Yeltsin against Gennady Zyuganov which is ironic given their current unverified claims which have not been validated. Obama bombed and prosecuted wars in over seven counties. He dropped over twelve thousand more bombs than Bush did. He used ten times as many drone strikes as Bush. Drones have a fail rate of 90% for context there was 60% fail rate for the laser guided bombs of Desert Storm. Are we seriously supposed to believe, given the advances in technology especially military technology, that two decades led to a regressive thirty percent increase in missed targets? Yet the bovine excrement refrain “drones are the safest and most accurate weapons we have” kept coming from Obama. Between Barack Obama's elections and Trump's election Hillary Clinton threatened war against Russia, China, Iran and Palestine. As Secretary of State in the Obama administration she brought a genocidal government to power in Honduras which has the world's highest murder rate, also there has been such a zealous degree of femicide in Honduras that it constitutes an effective genocide as there are not enough females to reproduce the Honduran population {I'm with Her(!)}, she helped Obama's leading NATO's effort to overthrow Gaddafi which itself led to al Qaeda, D'aesh and Ansar al Sharia committing black genocide in Libya. This indicates that Clinton does not think that African lives matter despite the courtship of a certain black supremacist group. She oversaw the arming of the aforementioned groups and Ahrar al Sham in Syria Working class people don't want their taxes to support a militaristic foreign interventionist agenda. The Democrats are callously ignoring the considerable anti war contingent of their party. Could the Military Industrial Media and Academic Complex not make ample profits from stockpiling? After all the United States of America does have the Second Amendment to it's constitution

This is another issue which the Democratic Party and Justice Democrats get wrong. Infringing upon the right to bear arms is not going to win votes or elections. If anything it will keep costing Democrats votes and elections. American people know if law abiding people give up their firearms that criminals, violent cartels and gangsters will still be armed. Another thing that is rarely considered and discussed is that there vast wilderness in rural areas of America. There are districts and counties without police stations or points of contacts for miles around. What should an American do if they are attacked by an armed and violent criminal in such circumstances especially considering it could be a life or death matter? Such subtlety and nuances are absent from DNC and DLC policy formulation. It also serves to highlight the Democrats' hypocrisy on abortion once again. The ratio of abortion deaths to gun deaths in America is thirty nine to one. Last year due to a decrease in the number of abortions it was twenty seven to one. Yet Democrats rail against gun violence while loudly pushing abortion. The hypocrisy is abundantly clear to pro life people who believe in the second amendment.

The Democrats cowardice on healthcare and not fighting for single payer Medicaid for all is literally killing the party. Not defending the Medicaid and Medicare programs damages Democrats massively. If a party does not defend health coverage for poor people and elderly people or fight to expand said coverage then they will not get working class people out to polling stations to vote for the party. It is imperative that the Democratic Party realise this. Government insurance, the public option, may have temporarily resolved the issue in the past however that will not satisfy the people of America especially given the justifiably foul mood that they are in. If the president reverts to his position on health during 2000 and 2001, single payer, then he could seriously embarrass the Democrats. The issue of healthcare in America is too important to be ceded needlessly to the far right of the Republican Party when you consider that Paul Ryan has been dreaming of kicking poor people and old people off Medicare and Medicaid since he was a college student.

Obama wasted his presidency. He wasted his congressional majorities in relation to healthcare. He did not have the balls to go for single payer. He should not have settled for anything less than the public option. What he did was take the Heritage Foundation plan, what used to be known as Nixon care and what was known as Romney care in Massachusetts and repackaged it as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Instead of health coverage for all people Obama gave people the Republican alternative to single payer. Fining people for not buying private insurance is not left wing and it is certainly not democratic. The best Barack Obama could aspire to with the bully pulpit of the President of the United States of America was lower cost private insurance. That is a pathetic indictment of the former president. He could not even get effective or efficient price controls on the cost of insurance premiums hence why the phrase lower cost private insurance was used instead of low cost private insurance. What legitimate basis is there for private insurance companies being involved in something as paramount as healthcare especially considering the life and death implications? Absolutely none whatsoever. Democrats should have the balls to point out that healthcare is a human right according to article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but the Democratic Party leadership do not believe in human rights not that they would have the testicular fortitude to articulate said belief if they believed in human rights. At the very least they should have the gumption to point out that the system America has wastes $753 billion a year with $145 billion going to administrative costs and $608 billion being directly attributable to the private for profit health insurance industry. Hope and change meant people expected single payer not a rigged private health insurance market for monopolising corporations.

Providing a toxic living environment for people is detrimental to said people's health. It is incredible something that is so blatantly obvious needs to be stated. Corporate Democrats seem to be blissfully unaware of this. Obama point blank refused to utilise the supremacy clause, article 5 clause 2 of US Constitution, to enforce the Fort Laramie Treaty in North Dakota in relation to the Dakota Access Pipe Line. The same pipe line was opposed, and correctly so, in Bismark so why would, or should, the people of Standing Rock be any different? Why did the Army Corps Engineers give easements to Energy Transfer Partners and Conoco? Especially in the circumstances of minimal consultation and no environmental impact assessment or investigation which is also illegal under United States federal law? Did Obama seriously expect Donald Trump, who has shares in Energy Transfer Partners, to enforce federal law in conflict with his own vested interests? Would Hillary Clinton have enforced federal law in relation to the aforementioned case? Numerous massive contributions to campaign finances from Wahhabi emirs on the Gulf strongly indicate that Hillary Clinton would not have acted against big oil. The autocrats were paying to play. Another disappointment in relation to the environment is that the Obama administration did not persist with it's funding to expand solar roadways technology. Worse still the use of thermodynamic panels has not expanded and it is not more widespread. Thermodynamic panels constantly produce energy above the temperature of minus forty degrees centigrade. America has an eighteen trillion dollar economy and access to this technology yet for all the Democrats rhetoric about saving the planet and inconvenient truths the inconvenient truth in that the Democratic Party's record on the environment has been that of a subservient slave to a Wahhabi cartel.

Taking huge political contributions from Gulf Council tyrants has massively hindered the Democratic Party's ability to deal with an active security threat to the United States of America and it's citizens. While there may be more violence from Puerto Rican nationalists, in their defence they want independence they do not want to impose their brand of far right theocracy on the everyone, there can be no doubt that the Wahhabi ideology can lead to mass murder of Americans. As previously stated Jimmy Carter's intervention in the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan created al Qaeda a group whose very name is synonymous with far right Wahhabi terror. Also Carter's Camp David accords led to Anwar Saddat being assassinated. This led to al Qaeda vowing to create an Islamic State. Bill Clinton's record on dealing with Wahhabi tyrants is little better. Bill Clinton got $600,000 from Saudi Arabia to give two speeches and got a gift of $1million from Qatar. Saudi Arabia funded a fifth of Hillary Clinton's election campaign. What is not widely reported is that while D'aesh split from al Qaeda during Bush junior's presidency is that during the Clinton administration an al Qaeda affiliate known as Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad was formed. They would later achieve notoriety in the Iraq War and later on as D'aesh. Obama was as guilty as any recent Democratic president for coddling Wahhabi tyrants. Throughout his presidency Saudi Arabia was the top importer of American arms. Obama politically and militarily supported Saudi Arabia's backing of the Wahhabi coalition of al Qaeda, D'aesh and Ansar al Sharia in their genocidal slaughter of the people of Yemen. Do right wing Democrats think working class Americans want their tax dollars to back such hideous groups? Did they not get the message that al Qaeda and Ansar al Sharia are unpopular when the GOP kept screaming Benghazi over and over again? How did backing said nefarious characters in Libya, Syria and Yemen work out for the Democratic Party? The Democratic Party are afraid to call bigots engaging in Wahhabi violence by the name of radical Islamic terror so it follows that they do not have the gumption to stand up to the monarchical tyrants funding said terror. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran came about because Obama sanctioned Iran into it for the benefit of Wahhabi dictatorships and their allies. Deference to Medinat Yisrael's far right allies on the Gulf Cooperation Council clearly hinders America in it's ability to combat the real and often imminent threat of Wahhabi terrorism. Why did Barack Obama or any Democrats not condemn Benjamin Mileikowsky visiting an injured terrorist from Jabhat al Nusra, later known as Jabhat Fateh al Sham, in al Jawlan? Have they forgotten what people belonging to Jabhat Fateh al Sham's movement did on a certain Tuesday morning? It should be noted that organisation inspired bombings in New York during September last year and that eighty seven people in America have lost their lives to acts of Wahhabi terror during the last decade. That number jumps astronomically to three thousand and eighty two people if the last two decades are looked at. Democrats should stop taking money from fundraisers of terrorism if they are to survive as a political entity. They should also stop funding the allies of those who fund terrorism. In other words stop taking donations from GCC states and stop funding Medinat Yisrael.

Another thing the Democratic Party need to change, Justice Democrats are also guilty on this issue, is their disgusting attitude towards seventy two percent of the American people. It ought to be axiomatic that an Aryan majority country is not going to vote for a party that spews racist anti Aryan bovine excrement in numerous diatribes. The Democratic Party, especially the right wingers, need to realise their coddling of virulent anti Aryan bigots made the palaeoconservative alternative right Republican Party electable with the Trump/ Pence platform. Supporting and excusing overt racist bigotry from a number of non Aryan sources including activists of Black Lives Matter helped to make Donald Trump the president. This is a far cry from the days when Ted Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy and Philip Hart promising the American people that the ethnic demographic make up of the American population would not change with the Immigration Reform Act 1965. Embracing racists like Jehmu Greene, Richard Fochtmann and Symone Sanders while Sally Boynton Brown calls to unify the Democratic Party around shutting other white people down. The Chicago torture incident showed people the contempt the Democratic Party has for white people. Democrats were reticent to condemn this (Obama and BLM to their credit condemned it quickly), questioned whether it was a hate crime, certain individuals denied it was a hate crime and some said it was only a hate crime because the victim was disabled despite the fact he was clearly targeted on the basis of his complexion and the fact the perpetrators loudly announced their mens rea by shouting ethnic slurs. This is not the only time Democrats have been piss poor on the issue of race. Narrowing the charge against Samir Shabazz to an injunction and dismissing charges against the New Black Panther Party for their armed voter intimidation in Philadelphia whilst they shouted racial epithets was racist by Barack Obama's administration and Eric Holder's Justice Department. The United States Commission on Civil Rights found that there were“numerous specific examples of open hostility and opposition” to the Justice Department pursuing civil rights cases where white people were the victims of civil rights violations. Jim Webb is right when he told Tucker Carlson that the Democratic Party is unnecessarily focused on “interest group politics” and making the white working class a “whipping post”.Jim Webb also correctly pointed out that affirmative action is racist discrimination that excludes white working class people. He stated the obvious that even if white working class people are poor and hurting the Democrats will always inform said people that they are privileged based solely on their complexion and ethnicity. Webb stated that he believed in dignity and fairness and not “diversity” programs that exclude people for being white. Webb correctly pointed out that the white working class correctly perceive that the Democratic Party does not like them. Only twenty eight percent of Democrats think racism against white people is as big a problem as racism against black people and other groups of people. Seventy one percent of Democrats are openly racist and they don't think bigotry against white people is a problem. Worryingly the Mint Press News poll showed that only forty three percent of all Americans agree with the former and that fifty five percent, over half, are fine with the racist bigotry of the latter. Fifty seven percent of white Americans and fifty two percent of all Americans are correct to point out that the American way of life has mostly changed for the worse. This is another statement that is so obvious it should be axiomatic. It turns out enforcing Roe and Doe while implementing the policies of Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush, Clinton, George W Bush and Obama made things worse. Who would have thought it(?) In the nineteen fifties working class Americans could earn living incomes, afford an education, afford a house, afford a car and afford quality health care coverage with their insurance plan due to pro working class policies of the New Deal. This was at a time when America cared about it's people. This was a time when working class American children were not killed for profit margins in abattoirs. Yet the idiots who chipped away at the New Deal ought to be celebrated, according to malevolent elites, because they implemented bullshit half a loaf concessions to narrow socially liberal causes. What the elitist right wingers of the Democratic Party have to realise is that pushing Richard von Coudenhove Kalergi's Practical Idealism is not helping them but that it is rather effective murder weapon for those who seek to kill off the United States Democratic Party for good. This would be a shame as it is the second oldest political party in the world having been founded in 1790 with only the British Conservative and Unionist Party being older with the Tory Party being founded in 1678. On the Democratic Party's promise of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act not changing the racial demographics of the United States they have broken said promise. White Americans have went from being 88.6% of the population to 72.4% despite increasing their numbers by over 130 million. Black Americans have only increased their share by 2% in the same period and natives have tripled their share from 0.3% to 0.9%. Hispanics have quintupled their numbers and despite their people generally having a pro life outlook that is not all natural population growth. Asians share has increased tenfold from half a percent to five. The point is clear there is a strong positive correlation between immigration and demographic change in the United States of America. Promoting and aggressively pushing identity political agendas of other groups not only alienates white working people from the Democratic Party but it has also provoked and resulted in a deserved Caucasian identitarian backlash that was a long time coming. A party cannot on the one hand advocate for and promote the = National Council of La Raza (The Race in the Castillan language) and Black Lives Matter but on the other hand state loudly and clearly that American Renaissance, National Policy Institute and New Century Foundation are beyond the pale ideologically. Either all identitarianism and identity politics is beyond the pale ideologically or all identitarianism and identity politics is socially and politically acceptable. It is racist hypocrisy to say the identiarianism and identity politics should be encouraged for certain groups but it should be discouraged and opposed from one certain group. This racist hypocrisy has permeated to such a great degree that if you replace the words white male with the words Ashkenazim Jew then numerous articles and blogs of social justice warriors, the fake new left and Democratic Party supporters read like racist propaganda from Nazi Germany. While Democrats are quick to jump up to defend those they call people of colour far too few Democrats defend the white working class and when they do it is hesitant and apologetic. Is it any wonder white working class Americans don't flock to the polling stations to vote Democrat like they used to when said Democratic Party is openly and overtly hostile to them, their interests and their aspirations? Why should people vote for a party that wants to diminish said people's influence in their country and a party that is truculent towards them and towards the economic policies that would benefit said people?

Anti Caucasian Racism is fuelling the Alt Right

In parts of the Occident we face a massive problem which many people deny existence of or simply ignore. There is rampant anti Caucasian racism and it is about time we as society, and those of us with left wing ideologies in particular, must not only address but fight and defeat. If we don't we are going to see more movements like the alternative right section of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's support. This issue has not arisen overnight but has gained momentum in recent years. Racists like Sukant Chandan would not have had the confidence to advocate Caucasian genocide in Europe in the past. Think about it, with the exception of a few individuals and organisations who else raises public awareness of the Boer Afrikaner genocide in South Africa or the Southern Rhodesian genocide in Zimbabwe? It is certain many reading this will not have encountered the aforementioned subjects prior to this article. It is shocking that those crimes are excused and justified by apologists as collective punishment for the crimes committed under the South African National Party and the Rhodesian Front even though many of the younger victims were not even conceived when those governments were in power. It should be well noted that a certain Bavarian autocrat from Austria justified genocide as collective punishment hence why collective punishment is a crime against humanity under international law.

It is irrational to ignore or deny racism against a certain ethnicity. It would be ridiculous to suggest there is no anti black racism, that 7,000 black people are not violently killed on America's streets every year or that between 365,000 and 684,000 black babies are not killed in America every year when facts show otherwise. So why would people deny obvious anti Caucasian racism unless they are racist against Caucasians?

Noel Ignatiev a “professor” at Harvard would have been fired if he had said what he said about Caucasians about any other ethnicity. He has spewed “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the White race. By any means necessary.” That is far from the only genocidal incitement he has made. Other instances of his bile include “Treason to Whiteness is loyalty to humanity”, “The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists.” and “So long as the White race exists, all movements against racism are doomed to fail.” His assertion about loyalty to humanity is particularly interesting bovine excrement. Does Ignatiev think the world would have been better off without heart transplants, renewable energy, Geiger counters, human genome sequencing, deoxyribose nucleic acid tests, auto-mobiles, fire arms, cutlery, swords, irrigation, anthropology, vacuum cleaners, washing machines, light bulbs, wheels, wheelchairs and numerous other modern inventions? If he does then he should not hold the academic rank of professor. In any case his racist bigotry should disqualify him from the position. However this tolerance of this particular strand of bigotry has emboldened him to articulate more violent incitements “We’ll keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”

Ignatiev is not alone in his extremely racist and bigoted backwoods views. Leroy Jefferson stated “We have to exterminate white people off the face of this planet.” in the wake of Hurricane Katrina as collective punishment for the Bush administration's pathetic handling of the disaster. Ignatiev's twisted world view was espoused by Black Lives Matter activists in a debate at Harvard when they articulated “Our argument is that white life is wrong.”, “Our argument is that we shouldn't have to affirm white life. Your argument affirming all life in general is not good. Its especially not good for black people”, “There is no ethical reason why white people deserve to live”, “For black life white death has to occur”, “Your life isn't worth affirming”against a Caucasian participant in the debate and adding his suicide would be “a step in the right direction”.

Imagine that being shouted about any other ethnicity or imagine it was said about a particular religious sect. Imagine how you would feel if these vitriolic diatribes were in relation to your ethnic group. Socialists, social democrats, liberals and a number of people on the left in the Occident (The West) are reluctant to address it. This is a gargantuan mistake. The Democratic Party and other left wing organisations have done between little to nothing to combat this form of racism. The Democratic Party leadership, in its infinite wisdom, have actually courted the black supremacists who espouse this hatred. Both Clinton and Sanders courted Black Lives Matter whereas only O Malley said all lives matter. Democrats have the audacity to muse why Caucasian males don't vote for them in the numbers that they use to.

All this hateful rhetoric has an effect. FBI crime statistics published in 2007 showed a white person was forty times more likely to be assaulted by a black person than a black person being assaulted by a white person in America. According to FBI statistics from 2013 the white on black murder rate was 0.77 per 1,000,000 compared to black on white murder rate of 9.83 per 1,000,000. The latest interracial crime statistics in America are worrying. White on black murder increased by 25%. Black on white murder increased by 12% and all interracial murders increased by 13%. The 500 black on white murders in 2015 were the highest since 504 black on white murders in 2008. What data from 2001 onwards shows is that the amount of black on white murders have consistently been double the amount of white on black murders in America. The US News graphs below display this data clearly. What should be noted from the first two graphs is that black on white murder is constantly higher than white on black murder. The third graph shows that there is not a massive disparity between the amount of Caucasians and the amount of African Americans who die violent deaths on America's streets. The fourth graph provides context and perspective with the problem of intra racial murders. Massive violence against Caucasians is the common denominator in all four graphs. This is the outcome of propagandising that violence towards Caucasians is acceptable. Those who argue that the forth is perpetrated by Caucasians are correct but it should be pointed out that there is no US Federal My Brothers' Keeper initiative to prevent intra racial violence among Caucasians as there is for African Americans despite the former being higher in number.

There are also the ongoing Boer Afrikaner and Southern Rhodesian genocides. They are not discussed never mind given the prominence they ought to be given. Between ten and twenty Afrikaners are murdered every day in South Africa. Over seventy thousand Afrikaners have been murdered since the African National Congress succeeded the National Party. Between ten and fourteen Boer farmers are murdered every week. Over four thousand Boer farmers have been murdered under the ANC. The murders are clearly racially motivated. They are often tortured, beaten and raped as well as butchered. This is shown clearly in Rian Van der Walt's War of the Flea documentary. People have been dragged by trucks over bumpy and rocky roads, people have had their fingers beaten off their hands with lead pipes, people have had their heads bashed in with blunt instruments, babies have been beaten with machetes, people have been raped and decapitated yet there are those who would deny targeting an ethnicity for such treatment is neither racist nor genocidal. Another racist double standard is that not a word is said in condemnation of the seven thousand exclusively Bantu towns in South Africa with no Caucasians, no Asians and no Khoisan, who were the original inhabitants, but Caucasian majorities in Balmoral, Orania and Owendale are condemned as is the significant Caucasian minority in Morgenzon and Caucasian majority areas on the Cape, in the Transvaal and the Orange Free State. In Zimbabwe there were 296.000 Southern Rhodesians when Ian Douglas Smith was premier. In 1999 there were 120,000 in Zimbabwe but now there are only 100,000 worldwide with only 28,000 left in Zimbabwe. Over twenty Southern Rhodesian farmers were murdered in violent takeovers in a land reform program by the Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front. The beneficiaries happened to be associates of the president. Rape gangs have targeted Caucasians in Zimbabwe on the basis of their race.

To understand why the genocide of European Caucasians from Africa is an outrage which should concern us all then imagine a scenario where all non Caucasian minorities in Europe and Caucasian majority nations in the Occident were suffering genocide and ethnic cleansing. There would be a massive international outcry and correctly so. Why is there not an international fury at what is happening to the Boer and the Southern Rhodesian? The absence of condemnation and action against these crimes gives out the immoral signal that racial discrimination against Caucasians is socially acceptable when it is completely unacceptable.

When certain organisations and individuals state the aim of “ending white privilege”, “ending white supremacy” and “ending white domination” they are not speaking about Caucasians not having privileges on the basis of their race, they're not talking about Caucasians not being considered supreme on the basis of their race and not about Caucasians dominating other ethnicities. It is a racist dog whistle and code for ending Caucasian existence. People who say they want to end racism don't mean they want to end racial discrimination but that they want to end the existence of Caucasians. Yet the same bigoted anti Caucasian racists want acceptance and tolerance from Caucasian people as Non Aligned Media explained.

A writer under the name Emily Goldstein had the brazen audacity to write a racist article saying Caucasian genocide is a “good thing”. Imagine if a person saying the genocide of Ashkenazim was a “good thing”? It is certain that individual would be condemned, ostracised, compared with an Austrian autocrat and probably charged with hate speech. Yet the interesting double standard persists. Many on the alternative right question whether or not there has been an Ashkenazim genocide. That is the retaliatory racism provoked by the anti Caucasian racism by Ashkenazim racists like Goldstein and Ignatiev. It is disgusting hypocrisy that supporters of the Zionist state of Medinat Yisrael get angry about Palestinians regaining the status of ethnic majority in their homeland and insist Palestine must always have an Ashkenazim majority yet encourage non Caucasian migration to ethnically cleanse Caucasian majority countries. Another glaring example of hypocrisy is the Ashkenazim activists who were vocal in their opposition to ethnic nationalist states with segregation and separate development for the Boer Afrikaner in South Africa and for the African Brythonic in Southern Rhodesia often do not voice the same opposition to an ethnic nationalist state with segregation and separate development for Ashkenazim in Palestine. In fact America informed the world of Israel's expectation that it will occupy Palestine permanently with a segregationist separate development state. The racist hypocrisy is emphatic. On the subject of states with segregation and separate development there is not much opposition among prominent Ashkenazim to the occupation of Ireland. Why is Stormont's segregationist separate development not condemned as the previous examples are? One thing is for certain the victims of said system are mostly European Caucasians as working class Irish and Brythonic people inhabit east and mid Ulster.

Yet Caucasian people are meant to take all of this passively. The same aforementioned racists and bigots have the brass neck to recoil at the fact a large number of Caucasians in America are supporting Donald Trump. They spewed hateful rhetoric and racist bile at Caucasians yet have the temerity to be shocked when angry Caucasians rally behind an authoritarian. What did they expect? This after The Atlantic asked “Will anyone mourn the end of white America? Will anyone try to preserve it?” Well in the large numbers of working class Caucasians among Trump's support, it should be stated it is not a homogeneous group, The Atlantic got their answer albeit not the one that they wanted. The Washington Post has pointed out increasing racism against Caucasians has boosted Trump's support. Sixty four percent of Republicans believe there is anti Caucasian racist discrimination and it should be emphasised they're a hundred percent correct in their belief.
The Socialist left needs to wake up to this. Unemployed Caucasians do not want to hear nor do they need to hear that they are privileged and supreme. Not having a job is not a supreme privilege and it is high time the Socialist left acknowledged it. Telling unemployed working class people that they are supreme and privileged will never unite the workers of the world. This racist practice will inevitably delay the day that Socialism is put into practice. Disaffected working class Caucasians will not turn to the ideology assailing “white privilege” and “white supremacy” as this is not only absurd but offensive to said people given their circumstances.

Other things the Socialist left needs to acknowledge are that people wanting their predominantly Caucasian country to remain predominantly Caucasian is not racist and that people wanting their predominantly Christian nation to remain predominantly Christian is not sectarian. Yet Christian Caucasians are supposed to accept this demographic alteration agenda passively without opposition. If the left really wanted to prevent racial and ethnic conflict they would be doing everything in their power to ensure that the Occident remains Caucasian and Christian. They are not doing everything in their power in fact many on the left are either doing nothing or making the problem even worse. Do they really think demographic change for ethnic cleansing and genocidal purposes will lead to the implementation of the Communist Manifesto? If anything it will lead to dystopic realisation of The Turner Diaries.

It is often overlooked that demographic change is only advocated, promoted and pushed in Europe and the Occident. The racism is clear as the common denominator is that all have European Caucasian ethnic majorities. Stefanie Von Berg of the Green Party openly brags about Germanic people being bred into an ethnic minority in Germany. Does she honestly think being smug and gloating about genocide will help the environmental cause among the people of Germany? Ironically the right wing Brandenburghers who are now complaining that Germany does not control its borders did nothing to oppose Western regime change by NATO and the EU against a left wing Socialist Communist Germany which did control its borders. The result has been disastrous for the people of the German nation.

Newsweek said making American Caucasians into a minority will save America. Joe Biden has angered many by saying American Caucasians becoming a minority is a “source of our strength”. Another thing the Socialist left needs to do is realise that Black Lives Matter is a racist and violent supremacist organisation. Video evidence has shown Black Lives Matter protesters chasing and assaulting Caucasians on the basis of the latter's complexions.

Another thing the Socialist left needs to acknowledge is that affirmative action and other similar positive discrimination programs are racist colour bars against Caucasians. Boer Afrikaners have been locked out of the South African job market due to their skin colour. There are 119 Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment statutes. These racist laws have not led to economically advanced Bantu working class people. Three million working class Bantu people are employed under the African National Congress government which is half of the six million Bantu working class people that were employed under the National Party. It has led to 1,000,000 working class Boer Afrikaners living in absolute poverty along with over 8,000,000 other working class South Africans.

It has not worked in America either. People who are not European Caucasians are given preference in terms of employment over people European Caucasians in statute. Thomas Sowell, Deryck Green and many others have pointed out that this does not help working class African Americans. It does help middle class people who are not European Caucasians. In practice that means a middle class candidate who is not a European Caucasian has a law for their preferential treatment relative to a working class European Caucasian candidate. This results in not only the racist preference of non white people over white people but the classist preference of wealthy over poor. If affirmative action was about helping the poor working class people of all races would be given preferential treatment over middle class and upper class people of all races. This could be done by comparing family household incomes of all candidates and giving the post to the lowest household income. Affirmative action also means lower test scores get non European Caucasians into universities which has led to significant under representation of European Caucasians at Ivy League level. Also racial discrimination can propel individuals to the US Supreme Court as the Sonia Sotomayor case showed. This is the antithesis of meritocracy. This disproves that Caucasians get privilege on the basis of their race and those who assail institutionalised racism don't fight affirmative action even though it is the definition of institutionalised racism. It is racism practised by government institutions, it is systemic racism as the system practices racism against Caucasians and it is structural racism as government and state structures enforce this racist policy.

This deluge of anti Caucasian rhetoric, discrimination and violence will have societal repercussions. It has already emboldened the Alternative Right to a point that was unimaginable a mere two years ago. Alternative fur Deutschland are leading polls in Germany as Front National are in France. Add to this volatile mixture the explosive element of Wahhabi terrorism. On the evidence of what we have all witnessed since the Western and Gulf sponsored proxy intervention in Syria coupled with anti Caucasian racism amounts to a gift for Conservative and far right ethnic nationalist movements across Europe and the Occident. A lot of those attracted by the Alternative Right are friendly conservative minded Caucasian people who are proud of their European heritage however it must also be stated that there are darker and more authoritarian elements who are aggressively inegalitarian as a matter of principle. It has not gone unnoticed that branches of the Ku Klux Klan, Virginia being one example, have advocated campaigning to get Trump elected. Sixteen percent of Trump supporters in South Carolina were willing to tell pollsters that they are white supremacists which is further evidence of retaliatory racism in response to anti Caucasian racism. The hard core of the far right actively celebrate the German Workers Party and the centralised empire it built militarily despite the fact history shows it presided over the destruction of Germany, Prussia and the Sudetenland. This in turn led to the Swabian genocide so the Third Reich was not good for Germanic people.

The above is why Socialists need to address and combat the anti Caucasian phenomenon as there will be many Caucasians who will have little option but to rally behind such elements to preserve their posterity, culture, heritage and identity. Unless Socialists can provide a left wing alternative to advance the interests of working class Caucasians they are effectively abandoning them to the right when many working class Caucasians are left wing in their nature. Does any left wing Socialist think abandoning the Caucasian working class to the right will result in value being utilised for national infrastructure?

To further understand why demographic change in the Occident and only the Occident is so immoral historical precedents must be considered, What effect did en masse illegal Ashkenazim immigration to Palestine have? Palestinians were ethnically cleansed into a minority in their own country and seven decades later they are projected to become the majority in their own country again in a few decades. How did things go for indigenous Australians when White Australia had a policy of breeding out the black? They are less than three percent of the population of their own country. Where the aforementioned examples not racist? Wouldn't it be equally racist if those scenarios were played out in the Occident?

It would be wrong to see this implemented on the Orient or on Africa. It is equally racist and immoral to impose this on Europe and the Occident. You did not hear or read about representatives and public figures imploring the Gulf Cooperation Council nations and Medinat Yisrael to accept Syrian refugees despite the moral obligation to do so when said states funded and armed the terrorists in Syria that caused the refugees to flee. Don't hold your breath waiting for it to happen as it clearly won't happen as it would upset the Wahhabist donors, Zionist donors and the corporate media.

Another thing the Socialist left has to be honest about and acknowledge the part the malevolent pro choice and anti life movement plays in the demographic change agenda. It is no accident that this movement has spread throughout the Occident with many majority Caucasian nations legalising the barbaric and immoral practice of aborting babies. On demand alone. It does not require an advanced level of intelligence to predict that will hinder efforts to boost a declining Caucasian birth rate in Europe and across the Occident. This can be seen on map of western Europe below.

Is this a genuine left wing political position to take? Lets look at the hard left and the far left. A party that fits the description of hard left and far left is the Russian Communist Party. They have Communist and Socialist credentials for presiding over a Socialist state for seven decades. What position do the Bolsheviks take on the controversial issue of abortion? The Russian Communist Party is staunchly pro life, in their own words, “to prevent the extinction of the Russian people”. The most left wing Communist and Socialist political party is pro life and opposes genocide of Caucasians. That speaks volumes when compared to anti Caucasian racists who claim to be left wing Socialists in the Occident. That comparison in itself is a damning indictment of the Socialist left in the Occident. As Ernesto Che Guevara Lynch said “It is easier to kill a guerilla in the womb than in the hills”. Hence it is easier to kill defenceless Caucasian children than it is to kill Caucasian adults who are intelligent and strong enough to fight back and defend themselves

There are things the Socialist left could do to boost Caucasian birth rates and increase Caucasian demographic percentages. They could fight for and ensure fully paid maternity leave and paternity leave and social welfare for families with children. This will encourage nuclear family units and is a left wing policy promoting procreation. The Socialist left could acknowledge that the nuclear family unit is often a person's first commune and that the first Socialists a person encounters are their parents. The Guardian has pointed out that Europe's declining demographics will result in an economic disaster, not that morally just cause of Caucasian survival should ever be a question of economics.

In America university students are taught courses titled US Race Theory and the Problem of Whiteness. This disgusting racism should be called out for the Fascist vitriol that it is. While it has been well documented that Trump supporters have committed hate crimes against Hispanics, African Americans and Muslims in America what has not been given the same prominence is the racist hate crimes committed against Trump supporters. Many of the violent Trump supporters were Caucasian and many of those who were violent towards Trump supporters were not and further evidence is that a Bernie Sanders supporter was a victim of anti Trump violence. He was a Caucasian.

Diversity is often another racist dog whistle meaning less Caucasians and meaning more people of non Caucasian ethnicities. The incorrect and inaccurate logic is that less Caucasians means more diversity and more Caucasians means less diversity. This bovine excrement and balderdash must be exposed as the execrable racism that it so blatantly is and this is yet another thing the Socialist left needs to realise. Broadly speaking as a race Caucasians are the most diverse race. The people can have brown hair, ginger hair and blond hair and they can have brown eyes, hazel eyes, green eyes and blue eyes. With Australasians, east Asians and Africans it is black hair and brown eyes. Not much diversity. Yet diversity the racist dog whistle codeword used for genocidal racism against the most diverse people. The fact that most European ethnic groups can be classed as Nordic, Alpine, Adriatic, Baltic and Mediterranean demonstrates diversity among Aryan people in Europe. The ethnic map of Europe should finally and fatally discredit the idea that more European Caucasian Aryans means less diversity. Every name represents a distinct group of people. Below that is the genetic map of Europe which is further evidence of the diversity of European Caucasians.

Then there is the controversial issue of Caucasian free zones and spaces without Caucasians be it Bahar Mustafa's racist conference in London, Black Lives Matter at the University of Missouri black healing space, or the no Caucasian residential areas in African American areas in America or disproportionately Wahhabist areas of Europe. In these areas Caucasians are often assaulted and violently forced to leave. The Socialist left, and everyone else for that matter, has to acknowledge not only the existence of such areas but the immorality and racism of them as well. Bahar Mustafa is a racist backwoods bigot. She has no appreciation that Englaland is the homeland of the Anglian people of Angeln, she has no appreciation that Prydain the historical homeland of the Brythonic and she does not appreciate that London is so called as it is the Fort of Lud. She also tweeted the genocidal incitement #KillAllWhiteMen. Her occupation? Diversity officer. Yet she wants the most diverse people gone.

The rationale for the racist collective punishment of European Caucasians is that European nations had colonial military and political empires by violently annexing This is racist as Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Cornwall and Finland are all nations which did not have colonial empires with territories outside Europe. This racist rationale also conveniently ignores that East Asian nations such China, Japan and Mongolia had vast military empires. In Africa the Bantu empire violently annexed territories through the means of genocide of the indigenous populations. There were the empires of the Aztecs, Mayans, Incas and Olmecs who all used violence in order to secure increasing territory on the American continents. Yet the racist collective punishment of Caucasians through demographic change is advocated whereas it is not promoted against East Asians, Africans or Americans. The Socialist left must recognise the immorality of this and do everything in its power to oppose and prevent this racist collective punishment. If it does not then any hope of Socialism being implemented in the Occident or elsewhere is extremely unlikely.

Does anyone on the Socialist left really believe that the aforementioned racism will result in a genuine Socialist government coming to power? Under the Parti Socialiste, and it is clear there is nothing Socialist about Brussels puppet Hollande government which implemented austerity with viciousness, Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo thought it would be acceptable having a mural with the words “La France aux Francais”, France for the French, crossed out and the words “Les Françaises aux Africains”, the French (feminine) for the Africans, displayed without being obscured. A French lady on the Alternative Right wrote “Francais” over the word “Africains”. This shows that Hidalgo's racism defied logic and will significantly increase Front National's chances of governing France. Actions such as the one described will not only ensure Parti Socialiste will not return to power, which would not a be a bad thing at all, but it will also smear the ideology of genuine Socialists. This means the name of Socialism will be tarnished in France, and many other nations in the West, as many working class Caucasians will not support representatives who are openly racist towards them. To summarise if everyone, the Socialist left in particular, does not stop and reverse demographic change against Caucasians then the Alternative Right and the far right will rise and control Europe and the Occident for several decades. The means of productions won't be controlled, owned and utilised by the working class. Value will not be distributed equitably and it will not be invested in local and national infrastructures. Appropriation of value for endeavour will not provide living incomes and increasing living standards unless the Socialist left can stand up to the corporate plutocratic forces behind demographic change and successfully defuse the racist time bomb. If that doesn't happen then race riots, race wars and a significant increase in intense racist violence will not only hurt and kill Caucasians but people of other ethnicities as well. This is a situation we'd all like to avoid and it is a scenario that we all have a stake in preventing.

California euthanise 111 people in half a year

Musical about baby killing in Philladelphia

Libya liberate Benghazi from Wahhabists